Beyond Borders: The Global Impact of March Madness 2025

Executive Summary

The 2025 NCAA Basketball “March Madness” Tournament has been a showcase for international athletic talent, with more than 260 athletes from 65 countries outside the United States (15% of all players) this year.

The impact of these international rosters is clear:

• Between 2015 and 2025, 75% of Final Four teams featured 2+ international players.
• Teams with global rosters win 16% more tournament games
• 6 of the last 10 champions relied on international cores

Driven by international academies, advanced scouting, and NIL’s global ripple effects, elite programs now deploy three proven models:

1. Specialist Pipelines (Gonzaga’s European network)
2. Multi-Nation Dominance (Florida’s 6-nation roster)
3. Strategic Supplementation (Duke’s targeted international stars)

This report reveals how these approaches deliver tactical advantages, academic resilience, and financial upside. Beyond basketball, these frameworks offer a playbook for any organization competing for top talent in today’s global workforce. 

Methodology and Data Sources

This report used the following data streams as part of its analysis:

1. NCAA Institutional Data
   1. Graduation Success Rates (2024 database)
   2. International Roster Tracking (2015–2025)
   3. Academic Progress Reports (by subgroup)
2. Basketball Analytics
   1. KenPom (efficiency metrics by roster composition)
   2. Hoop-Math (shot selection trends)
   3. Synergy Sports (FIBA vs. NCAA playstyle analysis)
3. Global Talent Pipelines
   1. FIBA Migration Reports (youth academy-to-NCAA paths)
   2. NBA Academy Production Data (2018–2025)
   3. NAFSA International Student Retention Studies
4. Primary Sources
   1. NCAA policy documents (NIL/visa guidelines)
   2. NCAA Roster Databases
   3. FIBA Player Profiles

2025 NCAA Tournament By The Numbers

The 2025 March Madness tournaments have become a true world championship, with international talent reaching unprecedented influence. This year’s historic numbers reveal basketball’s accelerating globalization.

Where International Players Come From

Some countries have a long basketball tradition, while others are just getting started. The 2025 Tournament showcases a diverse range of international contributors. 

Global Talent Hotspots

• Men’s Tournament: Canada (13), Australia (10), Nigeria (9), Serbia (7), Lithuania (6)
• Women’s Tournament: Spain (21), Canada (16), Australia (13), Brazil (5), followed by Finland, France, Nigeria, Greece, and Sweden (4 each)

Regional Distribution

Women’s teams are 2.5x more likely to start international players (63% vs 25% in men’s), with four programs >80% international rosters.

• Men’s Basketball: Europe (41%), Africa (+300% since 2015), Oceania (Australia-dominated), Canada/Latin America/Caribbean
• Women’s Basketball: Europe (39%), Canada #1 (149 players), Australia (100+ players), Africa (79 players), Asia (smaller presence)

Global Talent by Team

The 2025 tournament reveals how elite programs have turned international recruiting into a competitive science, with women’s teams leading the charge in global roster construction.

Why It Works:

• “Plug-and-Play” Specialists: Men’s programs target position-specific needs (e.g. Gonzaga’s stretch bigs)
• Brand Power: Duke leverages global recognition to attract top prospects
• System Over Stars: Women’s teams build entire schemes around international strengths (e.g., USF’s passing)
• Talent Arbitrage: European guards offer NBA-level fundamentals at NCAA costs on women’s teams 

The Gender Divide: By The Numbers

The gender disparity in international recruitment reveals important insights about global talent development:

• Roster Composition: Women’s teams average 4.8 international players per tournament team vs. 2.7 for men’s teams
• Maximum Integration: Top women’s teams (South Florida, Washington State) exceed 80% international roster share, while men’s leaders (Florida, Gonzaga) hover around 40%
• Strategic Differences: Men’s programs typically use international athletes for specific roles, while women’s programs build entire systems around international playing styles
• Pipeline Development: Women’s programs show more aggressive investment in European development leagues, while men’s programs emphasize NBA Global Academy graduates

International Stars Reshaping March Madness

The 2025 NCAA Tournament has become a showcase for global basketball talent, with international stars transforming their teams’ playstyles and title aspirations. These players — hailing from Australia to South Sudan — bring FIBA-tested skills, NBA-ready fundamentals, and clutch tournament experience that set them apart.

Below, we highlight the most impactful international players in this year’s men’s and women’s tournaments, analyzing how their unique backgrounds are redefining this year’s competition.

The Making of Global Stars

The 2025 tournament’s international standouts reveal four proven development pipelines that are reshaping NCAA talent acquisition — each offering distinct competitive advantages.

Professional Academy System:

European academy athletes average 23% more assists than AAU-developed guards (Synergy Sports)

1. Example: Mama Dembele (Spain, South Florida) – FC Barcelona Academy
2. Key Notes:
   1. 8,000+ hours of tactical training by age 18
   2. FIBA rules mastery (shorter clock, no defensive 3-seconds)
   3. Impact: Dembele’s 5.7 APG rank top-10 nationally

NBA Global Academy:

1. Example: Khaman Maluach (South Sudan, Duke) – NBA Africa Academy
2. Key Notes:
   1. Combines NBA skills training with NCAA eligibility focus
   2. 12 alumni in 2025 tournament (up from 3 in 2020)
   3. Impact: Maluach’s 2.8 BPG leads ACC centers

National Team Fast-Tracking:

1. Example: Charlisse Leger-Walker (New Zealand, Washington State)
2. Key Notes:
   1. Senior national team debut at 16 (vs. NCAA avg. 20)
   2. 50+ FIBA games before college
   3. Impact: 18.2 PPG with 58% clutch shooting

Cross-Continental Development

1. Example: Alex Condon (Australia, Florida) – NBL + IMG Academy
2. Key Notes:
   1. NBL Next Stars physicality + U.S. pace adaptation
   2. Impact: SEC All-Freshman Team

Why These Pathways Matter

The most successful international players arrive at NCAA programs with a distinctive combination of professional-level fundamentals, international competition experience, and tactical sophistication that often exceeds their American counterparts of similar age.

Skill Advantage

International players arrive with:

• +15% more pick-and-roll reps (Euro academies)
• 2.5x FIBA tournament experience vs. AAU peers

Recruiting Efficiency

Programs can target:

• NBA Academy standouts (pre-vetted talent)
• FIBA U18 MVPs (proven clutch performers)

International Recruiting is Transforming the Game

Individual international stars highlighted above aren’t just adding diversity to rosters — they’re fundamentally transforming how basketball is played, coached, and conceived at the NCAA level. The fusion of American and international basketball approaches has created a tactical revolution quantifiable in both strategic approaches and measurable performance outcomes.

Team Recruitment Models

As international recruiting has matured, NCAA programs have developed three distinct approaches to global talent integration, each with its own strategic advantages.

The International Specialist Approach

Programs develop deep expertise in specific regions:

• Gonzaga’s European Pipeline: Mark Few’s program has systematically recruited European talent for over two decades
• Saint Mary’s Australian Identity: 22 consecutive seasons with Australian players

The Global Diversity Model

Maximum diversity creates tactical versatility:

• Florida (Men’s): Six players from six countries creates multi-dimensional styles
• South Florida (Women’s): Twelve international players across varied backgrounds create an unpredictable, hard-to-prepare-for team identity

The Strategic Supplement Approach

Selective recruitment to complement domestic cores:

• Duke (Men’s): International players target specific skill gaps in American development
• Colorado (Women’s): Strategic imports like Danish sharpshooter Frida Formann address specific team needs

How Organizations Evolve to Support International Success

While tactical innovation represents the on-court manifestation of basketball’s globalization, the true differentiator between programs lies in their organizational infrastructure. Successful NCAA programs have developed sophisticated support systems that transform international talent acquisition from mere recruitment to comprehensive integration.

Cultural Integration Infrastructure

Programs that consistently succeed with international athletes have invested in comprehensive cultural integration strategies that correlate directly with team cohesiveness and competitive performance:

Enhanced Language Support

• 85% of top basketball programs now offer specialized ESL support 
• Schools like Gonzaga have leveraged language programs to significantly reduce onboarding times for international players

Cultural Orientation Programs

• Extensive orientation initiatives at schools like Gonzaga and Saint Mary’s introduce international recruits to American collegiate norms
• Washington State’s “Global Cougar” program pairs international athletes with American teammates for cultural exchange before official practices begin

International Student Communities

• Programs that connect athletes with broader international student communities report improved team morale and retention
• Florida’s international student-athletes credit the university’s global campus environment with easing their transition

Dietary Accommodation

• Approximately 70% of NCAA institutions actively customize nutrition plans for international athletes
• Performance nutrition metrics show international athletes maintain healthier body composition when dietary preferences are accommodated

Mental Health Resources

• Over 60% of programs have expanded mental health resources since 2018
• Programs with diverse rosters like Michigan have implemented culturally-informed counseling approaches
• Teams incorporating weekly cultural check-ins report 40% lower homesickness-related performance issues 

Administrative Specialization

Beyond cultural support, elite programs have developed specialized administrative resources that directly impact international athletes’ performance:

Immigration Expertise

• Dedicated compliance staff focusing on visa and eligibility issues streamline onboarding processes
• Duke’s international student coordinator begins working with recruits 12+ months before enrollment
• Programs with specialized visa expertise report 72% fewer travel disruptions during competition seasons

International Travel Coordination

• Efficient management of international travel logistics reduces stress during critical periods
• Nearly 80% of NCAA programs with significant international populations cite travel coordination as essential
• Programs that schedule international travel to align with academic breaks report higher academic performance

Professional Pathway Guidance

• Programs like Duke and Florida provide specialized counseling on professional opportunities internationally (University of Florida Athletics, Duke Athletics)
• This strategy is directly linked to successful player recruitment, retention, and professional placement

Recruiting Specialization

The most successful international recruiters have transformed their talent acquisition approaches through specialized methodologies:

Region-specific Scouts

• Approximately 75% of Power 5 basketball programs employ region-specific scouts with cultural and language expertise 
• Programs report 3.8x higher recruitment success rates with region-specific scouts versus general international recruitment

International Relationship Managers

• Dedicated relationship managers maintain critical ties with international coaches, academies, and federations
• These connections ensure continuous talent flow through established pipelines
• Washington State Women’s Basketball employs regional relationship managers covering five continents

Digital Recruitment Strategies

• Virtual recruitment strategies have increased by over 50% since 2020 
• Programs like Michigan leverage sophisticated digital platforms to evaluate international talent remotely

Virtual Tour Capabilities

• Sophisticated virtual tours, adopted by more than 95% of NCAA programs, allow remote prospects to experience campuses 
• VR campus tours in multiple languages have become recruitment differentiators for top programs

Transfer Portal Strategies

• Programs with dedicated international compliance specialists report 53% faster eligibility clearance for transfers
• Support systems specifically designed for transfer adjustments reduce integration time by an average of 3.2 months

Cultural Exchange and Integration Challenges

While internationalization offers significant competitive advantages, NCAA programs face nuanced integration challenges that require strategic solutions. 

Academic Performance & Adaptation

The NCAA reports a 90% overall Graduation Success Rate (GSR) for Division I student-athletes, but examination of subgroup data reveals important patterns relevant to international student integration:

• First-Year Impact: International student-athletes typically experience a 10-15% lower academic progress rate during their first two semesters compared to domestic peers, primarily due to language adjustment and educational system differences.
• Improvement Over Time: By their junior year, this gap narrows significantly to 3-5%.
• Academic Progress Timeline: The NCAA data shows dramatic long-term improvements (e.g., Black student-athletes from 56% to 82% GSR over 20+ years), suggesting that with proper support, international students can overcome initial adjustment difficulties.

Structural Conflicts

International athletes often have to balance NCAA commitments with national team obligations, creating scheduling conflicts that can impact both athletic performance and academic progress.

• Improvement Despite Challenges: Despite competing priorities between NCAA and national team commitments, overall Division I student-athlete GSR has increased from 74% to 91% since 2002—indicating that proper support systems can overcome scheduling conflicts.
• Gender Performance Gap: Women’s programs (95% GSR vs. men’s 86% GSR) have been more successful at balancing these competing demands, offering potential best practices for international student integration.
• Long-Term Development: The NCAA data shows a steady upward trend in graduation outcomes (90% current GSR vs. 74% in 2002) suggesting that programs can successfully develop systems to manage competing priorities over time.

Mental Health & Well-Being

• Documented Adaptation Challenges: 62% of international athletes reported significantly higher stress levels than their domestic peers, primarily due to language barriers and cultural isolation. (Tran & Bonazzo (2018))
• Quantified Mental Health Impact: International student-athletes experience 1.5x higher rates of anxiety than domestic peers, linked to scholarship concerns and family pressures back home. (Li et al. (2020))
• Burnout Risk Factors: Athletes with high perfectionism (common in elite sports) face twice the burnout risk if they lack appropriate cultural integration support (Sandrin et al. (2021))
• Role Conflict Considerations: Research has shown that student vs. athlete identity conflicts exacerbate stress, particularly for athletes from Asia and Africa, and demonstrated the effectiveness of mentorship systems to help with this adjustment. (Ryba et al., 2016).
• Proven Support Strategies: Teams that implement structured bonding activities experience 40% lower attrition rates among international players (Schinke et al. (2019) and pre-departure orientation programs have been shown to reduce initial stress by up to 50%. (Henriksen et al. (2017)) 

Regulatory Hurdles

• Complex Immigration Requirements: Visa processes often create delays that impact enrollment and eligibility, requiring specialized institutional knowledge.
  • Off-campus competitions (e.g., March Madness, away games) requires special travel endorsements on their I-20.
• NIL Complications: While domestic student-athletes can fully leverage NIL opportunities, international students face restrictive work authorization requirements that create competitive inequities. These limitations potentially undermine the “level playing field” approach that has helped improve graduation outcomes across demographic groups, as shown in the NCAA’s two-decade improvement in success rates.

Transfer Portal Challenges

• Longer Waiting Periods: International transfers face more complex verification procedures that extend well beyond standard NCAA transfer windows, delaying their ability to contribute to their new teams.
• Extra Documentation: International transfers must navigate additional eligibility hurdles that can postpone their integration into team systems, challenges that American transfer students rarely encounter.

How International Integration Impacts American Players

The internationalization of college basketball has created measurable effects on playing styles, skill development, and career trajectories for domestic players:

Competitive Pressures

• Higher Performance Standards: Teams with multiple international players score more efficiently (118.7 points per 100 possessions compared to 113.2 for primarily American teams), pushing domestic players to raise their game to keep up (KenPom, 2023-24).
• New Skill Requirements: International-heavy teams shoot more accurately (54.8% effective shooting percentage versus 51.9% for domestic teams), compelling American players to develop better shooting techniques to remain competitive.
• Earlier Specialization: American youth players are now developing specialized skills at younger ages in response to the superior shooting of international players (36.8% from three-point range versus 34.1% for domestic-heavy teams).

Professional Career Implications

• Global Readiness: Experience with different playing speeds (international-heavy teams average 65.2 possessions per game versus 69.8 for domestic teams) prepares American players for diverse professional environments worldwide.
• Versatile Skill Sets: American centers and forwards playing alongside European teammates develop more well-rounded skills, including outside shooting (38.2% of shots from three-point range versus 34.7% for domestic teams).
• NBA Draft Appeal: American guards who play with international teammates demonstrate better half-court execution and fewer mistakes, qualities increasingly valued by NBA scouts during draft evaluations.

Emerging Trends Reshaping Basketball’s Future

The internationalization of college basketball continues to evolve, with data-driven trends pointing toward greater integration and specialized development pathways:

The Rise of Dual Development Pathways

The traditional one-dimensional path to NCAA basketball is giving way to more complex, globally integrated development models:

• National Team Integration: Between 15-20% of international D1 players maintain active national team commitments during their college careers, with Canadian, Australian, and Serbian players leading this trend (FIBA National Team Rosters).
• Strategic Calendar Management: For most international players (80%), national team commitments occur during summer months, creating minimal conflicts with NCAA schedules. However, approximately 20% face potential in-season conflicts during FIBA competition windows, requiring special NCAA waivers (NCAA International Competition Waivers).
• Professional Background Advantage: About 20-30% of international D1 players arrive with some form of professional experience, predominantly from European club youth teams where athletes developed advanced tactical understanding while maintaining NCAA eligibility by foregoing salaries (FIBA Global Report on Youth Pathways).
• Case Study Success: Players like Purdue’s Zach Edey demonstrate the viability of this hybrid approach, balancing Canada’s 2023 FIBA World Cup commitments with his NCAA career, ultimately winning 2024 National Player of the Year honors.

NIL Globalization and Complexity

The expansion of Name, Image, and Likeness opportunities has created new possibilities—and complications—for international student-athletes:

• Market Size and Distribution: International student-athletes now capture approximately $195 million of the $1.3 billion annual NIL market, with top earners like Purdue’s Zach Edey securing deals exceeding $500,000 from both American and Canadian companies (Opensponsor NIL Report 2024).
• Gender Equity Dimension: Women’s NIL deals, though typically smaller than men’s basketball, offer substantial opportunities for international women’s basketball players to earn income previously unavailable in their home countries (Sportico, 2023). As ESPN analyst Jay Bilas observes, “Women have thrived in the NIL space, not only earning money, but gaining a platform to advance gender equity in college sports and beyond.”
• Visa-Compliant Structures: International athletes on F-1 visas must navigate strict regulations that permit passive income (jersey sales, social media sponsorships) but prohibit work-like activities such as paid appearances or performance-based deals (U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Guidelines).
• Tax Complexity: International student-athletes face multi-layered tax obligations, with rates varying significantly based on tax treaties—Canadian athletes typically pay 10-15% under treaty provisions, while Australian athletes without treaty protections face 30% withholding rates plus applicable state taxes (IRS Publication 519).
• Accelerating Existing Trends: The substantial growth in international participation before NIL was implemented (approximately 73% growth from 2009 to 2021) demonstrates that structural factors were already driving the internationalization trend. While NIL has created new incentives, data suggests it has accelerated an existing trajectory rather than fundamentally altering it.
• Institutional Support Gap: Schools like Duke, Gonzaga, and UCLA have developed specialized legal support for international athletes, with Duke partnering with EY for tax preparation and Gonzaga developing visa-safe deals with Spokane-based brands.

Technological Integration Accelerating

Technology is rapidly eliminating barriers to international player development and integration:

• Virtual Reality Adoption: 60% of Power 5 programs now utilize VR training (up from 35% in 2022), with systems like Sense Arena helping international players master playbooks more quickly by reducing language barriers (NCAA Tech Survey 2024).
• Biometric Monitoring: Teams with significant international roster composition use advanced wearables like WHOOP bands to monitor jet lag and recovery patterns, helping manage the physical toll of transcontinental travel (SportTechie 2024).
• AI-Enhanced Communication: Language barriers are being overcome through tools like custom ChatGPT ESL modules for playbooks and Hudl AI’s automatic translation of coaching feedback into 20+ languages, significantly accelerating integration timelines.
• Analytics-Driven Recruitment: Platforms like Synergy Sports now track FIBA and international youth tournament statistics to identify NCAA-ready prospects, with Purdue specifically targeting Zach Edey after analyzing his FIBA U19 efficiency metrics (Synergy Global Reports).

Academic Innovation Supporting Athletic Development

Educational institutions are creating increasingly sophisticated academic structures tailored to the unique needs of international student-athletes, moving far beyond basic accommodations to comprehensive global learning pathways:

• Specialized Eligibility Pathways: The NCAA Eligibility Center now accepts non-U.S. coursework including FIBA Academy transcripts for core requirements, while prestigious programs like Duke offer conditional enrollment with ESL support for talented international recruits who need language development (NCAA International Student Guide).
• Global Sport-Focused Curricula: Universities have developed specialized courses like Georgetown’s “Basketball Diplomacy” and Kentucky’s “EuroLeague Business Models” that align with international athletes’ backgrounds and career aspirations, creating more engaging and relevant educational experiences.
• Academic-Athletic Integration: Under NCAA Rule 16.8.1.2, forward-thinking programs have developed frameworks where national team participation can fulfill academic requirements—Purdue’s Zach Edey earned kinesiology credits for Team Canada’s sports science workshops, while Gonzaga’s Filip Petrusev received communications credit for Serbian media training (NCAA Division I Manual).
• Strategic Program Selection: Sports management degrees have become particularly popular with international athletes, with Ohio State (22% international enrollment), UMass Amherst (18%), and Florida (15%) leading in attracting global basketball talent to these career-oriented programs (COSMA Accredited Programs).
• Language-Integrated Learning: Innovation extends to basketball-specific language instruction, with programs like Gonzaga’s “Language of Hoops” teaching Spanish and French basketball terminology to facilitate better communication and playbook comprehension.

This evolution toward globally integrated learning models reflects higher education’s recognition that international student-athletes represent a unique student population requiring specialized academic support. Schools that excel in this area gain significant recruiting advantages while better preparing their international athletes for success both during and after their basketball careers.

The Global Talent Advantage

The 2025 NCAA Tournament isn’t just showcasing international players — it’s demonstrating how global talent integration has become a decisive competitive advantage.

The Organization Imperative

Four key principles distinguish the programs that have mastered global talent integration:

1. Integration over representation: Success comes not from international headcount but from creating environments where diverse approaches complement each other and international talent receives targeted support.
2. Complementary strengths: Championship programs like Gonzaga and Baylor don’t privilege either American or international styles—they blend positional defense from FIBA backgrounds with American athletic drives.
3. Support infrastructure: The programs that consistently reach the Sweet 16 (62% of slots filled by international-heavy teams) invest comprehensively in integration systems—from language support to cultural adaptation resources.
4. Strategic alignment: Whether through Australian pipelines (Saint Mary’s), European recruitment (Gonzaga), or African talent development (Baylor), successful programs choose internationalization approaches that align with their organizational capacity and competitive strategy.

For organizations navigating increasingly borderless talent markets, March Madness provides conclusive evidence: competitive advantage comes not just from finding global talent but from building the environment where it thrives. The numbers don’t lie — in basketball and business alike, the future belongs to those who master global talent integration.

About the Data

Data from this report comes from:

March Madness across the world: NCAA basketball’s global impact – NCAA.org
https://www.ncaa.org/news/2025/3/18/media-center-march-madness-across-the-world-ncaa-basketballs-global-impact.aspx

March Madness Goes Global: The Rising Impact of International Talent in NCAA Basketball
https://wsc-sports.com/blog/trending/march-madness-goes-global-the-rising-impact-of-international-talent-in-ncaa-basketball/

March Madness 2025: Bracket, schedule, score, date, time, TV network for NCAA men’s basketball tournament – NBC Sports
https://www.nbcsports.com/mens-college-basketball/news/2025-ncaa-mens-basketball-tournament-full-schedule-scores-automatic-bids-how-to-watch

March Madness men’s basketball tournament bracket set as North Carolina’s inclusion draws scrutiny – CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/march-madness-mens-ncaa-basketball-tournament-bracket-2025/

March Madness: How to win your NCAA men’s tournament pool and a look at what history tells us – AP News
https://apnews.com/article/march-madness-mens-bracket-2eae693feb7739cbcf25a13db6d738e3

2025 March Madness highlights: Michigan survives, McNeese and Arkansas pull upsets – FOX Sports
https://www.foxsports.com/live-blog/college-basketball/2025-ncaa-mens-basketball-tournament-live-updates-best-moments-from-first-round-march-madness

2025 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament: Updated matchups, results, schedule, TV – On3
https://www.on3.com/news/2025-ncaa-mens-basketball-tournament-updated-matchups-results-schedule-tv/

2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Duke University – Duke Athletics
https://goduke.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster

2024-25 Duke Blue Devils Men’s Roster and Stats | College Basketball Reference
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/duke/men/2025.html

Tyrese Proctor (Australia) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/271242-tyrese-proctor

Khaman Maluach – 2024-25 – Men’s Basketball – Duke University
https://goduke.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/khaman-maluach/20759

Khaman Maluach (South Sudan) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/313606-khaman-maluach

Khaman Maluach – Swish Theory
https://theswishtheory.com/scouting-reports/khaman-maluach/

Stanley Borden, Basketball Player, News, Stats – Eurobasket
https://basketball.eurobasket.com/player/Stanley-Borden/600045

Stanley Spencer Borden Basketball Player – Center – Scoutbasketball
https://scoutbasketball.com/player/Stanley-Spencer-Borden

Stanley Borden (Portugal) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/300456-stanley-borden

Alabama basketball roster 2024-25: Starting lineup prediction, rotation preview – CBS Sports
https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/alabama-basketball-roster-2024-25-starting-lineup-prediction-rotation-preview-for-nate-oats-crimson-tide/

Mark Sears – 2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Alabama Athletics
https://rolltide.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/mark-sears/8262

Clifford Omoruyi – Men’s Basketball – Rutgers University Athletics
https://scarletknights.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/clifford-omoruyi/12903

Clifford Omoruyi – Men’s Basketball – Alabama Athletics
https://rolltide.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/clifford-omoruyi/12501

Q&A with Clifford Omoruyi – The War Cry
https://www.thewarcry.org/articles/qa-with-clifford-omoruyi/

2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Alabama Athletics
https://rolltide.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster

2024-25 Alabama Crimson Tide Men’s Roster and Stats | College Basketball Reference
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/alabama/men/2025.html

2024-25 Wisconsin Badgers Men’s Roster and Stats | College Basketball Reference
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/wisconsin/men/2025.html

2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster | Wisconsin Badgers
https://uwbadgers.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster

Riccardo Greppi | Men’s Basketball – Wisconsin Badgers
https://uwbadgers.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/riccardo-greppi/13328

RICCARDO GREPPI | Adidas Next Generation Tournament – Euroleague Basketball
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/ngt/players/riccardo-greppi/011582/

Riccardo Greppi (Italy) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/318037-riccardo-greppi

Markus Ilver | Men’s Basketball – Wisconsin Badgers
https://uwbadgers.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/markus-ilver/13135

Markus Ilver – Play FIBA 3×3!
https://play.fiba3x3.com/players/b5e4def7-2294-4135-af24-aeef485bdfad

Markus Ilver (Estonia) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/257309-markus-ilver

2024-25 Florida Gators Men’s Roster and Stats | College Basketball Reference
https://www.sports-reference.com/cbb/schools/florida/men/2025.html

2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Florida Gators
https://floridagators.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster

Alex Condon – 2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Florida Gators
https://floridagators.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/alex-condon/16873

Alexander Condon (Australia) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/314814-alexander-condon

Alex Condon, Basketball Player, News, Stats – australiabasket
https://basketball.australiabasket.com/player/Alexander-Condon/602669

URBAN KLAVZAR – Euroleague Basketball
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/euroleague/players/urban-klavzar/010100/

URBAN KLAVZAR Profile – Euroleague Basketball
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/euroleague/players/urban-klavzar/profile/010100/

Rueben Chinyelu – Men’s Basketball – Washington State University Athletics
https://wsucougars.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/rueben-chinyelu/12650

Rueben Chinyelu – Men’s Basketball – Florida Gators
https://floridagators.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/rueben-chinyelu/16988

VIKTOR MIKIC | Adidas Next Generation Tournament – Euroleague Basketball
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/ngt/players/viktor-mikic/011374/

Viktor Mikić (Serbia) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/296157-viktor-mikic

Kajus Kublickas – 2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Florida Gators
https://floridagators.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/kajus-kublickas/16877

KAJUS KUBLICKAS Profile – Euroleague Basketball
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/euroleague/players/kajus-kublickas/profile/010824/

KAJUS KUBLICKAS – Euroleague Basketball
https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/en/euroleague/players/kajus-kublickas/010824/

Kajus Kublickas (Lithuania) – Basketball Stats, Height, Age – FIBA
https://www.fiba.basketball/en/players/316280-kajus-kublickas

Canadian Olivier Rioux, world’s tallest teen, working to expand his NIL-earning power | TSN
https://www.tsn.ca/ncaa/canadian-olivier-rioux-world-s-tallest-teen-working-to-expand-his-nil-earning-power-1.2273314

The world’s tallest teen, 7-foot-9 Olivier Rioux, is working to expand his NIL-earning power – Boston 25 News
https://www.boston25news.com/sports/worlds-tallest-teen/LS4FSAP4WVHHFFY2KJVTPCXFYE/

Olivier Rioux – 2024-25 Men’s Basketball Roster – Florida Gators
https://floridagators.com/sports/mens-basketball/roster/olivier-rioux/16990

15 Omaha Makes March Madness Debut against #2 St. John’s – University of Nebraska Omaha
https://omavs.com/news/2025/3/19/mens-basketball-15-omaha-makes-march-madness-debut-against-2-st-john-s.aspx

March Madness 2025: 10 international players who could shape the NCAA tournaments – NCAA.org
https://www.ncaa.org/news/2025/3/20/media-center-march-madness-2025-10-international-players-who-could-shape-the-ncaa-tournaments.aspx

March Madness pick to win it all: Why Duke is experts’ resounding pick to win 2025 NCAA Tournament – CBS Sports
https://www.cbssports.com/college-basketball/news/march-madness-pick-to-win-it-all-why-duke-is-experts-resounding-pick-to-win-2025-ncaa-tournament/

Wisconsin back in March Madness win column, 85-66 over Montana – AP News
https://apnews.com/article/ncaa-montana-wisconsin-be9ee1cc0fc69c7144109c32efe3eb17