Skip Main Navigation

The History of U.S. Immigration Policy, Explained

A brief overview of how America’s immigration policies have evolved and impacted the nation over time

  • Written By:
    Rayna WachsRayna Wachs is a Content Strategist and Producer at Boundless Immigration.
  • Reviewed By:
    Alison MoodieAlison Moodie is the Managing Editor at Boundless Immigration
  • Updated April 10, 2025

The United States has always been a nation of immigrants, with people from all over the world coming to seek a better life. From the earliest European settlers to the diverse communities that make up the country today, immigration has shaped the nation’s identity, culture, and society. But the country’s immigration policies have not always been the same; they have evolved significantly, often reflecting the social, economic, and political climate of the time.

In this article, we break down the history of U.S. immigration policy at a high-level and examine how its evolution impacts today’s immigration landscape.

Thinking about taking the next step in your immigration journey? Boundless is here to help.

Get Started

European Colonization of the Americas (16th-18th Centuries)

The story of U.S. immigration begins long before the establishment of the nation itself, with the migration of European settlers to North America in the 16th century, who were driven by economic opportunity, religious persecution, and a desire for land and resources.

This European expansion, however, came at a tremendous cost to the Indigenous populations who had inhabited these lands for millennia. While early interactions involved trade and mutual curiosity, they quickly gave way to forced displacement, disease, and warfare that decimated native communities and drastically altered their traditional ways of life. While Native resistance was fierce, ultimately, they could not stop colonization.

The treatment of Indigenous people during colonization set a precedent for later immigration policies, which would disproportionately exclude non-European groups.

By the mid-18th century, British America had grown into a diverse patchwork of colonies, populated by immigrants from across Europe as well as enslaved Africans, who were violently captured and forced to migrate to North America.

As tensions between the colonies and the British Crown escalated, the American Revolution erupted, culminating in the establishment of the United States in 1776. 

Note

The legacy of colonization continues to affect both Indigenous and Black communities today, yet both remain resilient. Native peoples, despite enduring historical trauma, land dispossession, and discriminatory policies, have fought to preserve their land, culture, and sovereignty. Similarly, while the descendants of enslaved Africans and other Black Americans still experience the deep-rooted impacts of colonialism and systemic racism, modern social movements have brought these injustices to greater public awareness and continue to drive change.

Early American Immigration Policies (18th-19th Centuries)

In the early years of the U.S., immigration was largely unrestricted and featured open borders. The country was vast and sparsely populated, and the government encouraged immigration to help settle the land and build the economy.

Citizenship, however, was only available to free white men who had lived in the U.S. for at least two years. The first major piece of U.S. immigration legislation, the Naturalization Act of 1790, established rules for U.S. citizenship and a pathway for immigrants to attain it. It limited citizenship to free white people, male or female, who had lived in the U.S. for at least two years, as well as their children. Black, Indigenous, and Asian individuals were not eligible for citizenship.

Did you know?

Article I of the U.S. Constitution directly empowers Congress to establish laws regarding naturalization. The 14th Amendment to the Constitution grants birthright citizenship through the Citizenship Clause. Historically, immigration to the U.S. has been regulated through a series of Naturalization Acts and Immigration Acts.

In 1808, a ban was placed on the importation of enslaved people. This was a significant event as it represented an early attempt to regulate the flow of people into the U.S., albeit driven by deeply flawed and unjust reasons.

This period of open borders ended in the late 1800s when the number of immigrants climbed and economic conditions worsened. In 1875, the Supreme Court declared that the regulation of immigration was a federal responsibility. 

Congress began to pass immigration legislation, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, the Alien Contract Labor laws of 1885, and the Immigration Act of 1882. The Chinese Exclusion Act was the first law to target a specific nationality for exclusion, marking a significant shift from race-based exclusions to nationality-based restrictions. The Immigration Act of 1882 imposed a head tax on each immigrant and blocked the entry of individuals labeled “idiots, lunatics, convicts, and persons likely to become a public charge.” These early laws laid the groundwork for the more restrictive policies that would follow in the 20th century.

The Era of Quotas (1900s to 1960s)

The early 20th century saw a dramatic shift toward restrictive immigration policies. In 1917, Congress enacted the first widely restrictive immigration law, which included a literacy test, increased taxes on new immigrants, and the exclusion of immigrants from a geographically defined “Asiatic Barred Zone.” This was followed by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 and the Immigration Act of 1924, which established national origins quotas. These quotas limited the number of immigrants allowed entry into the U.S. based on their nationality, favoring immigrants from Northern and Western Europe. The 1924 Act also severely restricted immigration from Asia, reflecting the growing anti-immigrant sentiment and racist attitudes of the time.

The quota system remained in place for several decades, significantly shaping the demographics of the U.S. During this period, there was very little immigration. The national origins quotas effectively shut the door on immigrants from many parts of the world, particularly Asia and Southern and Eastern Europe. This had a profound impact on the cultural and racial makeup of the U.S. and contributed to a period of relative homogeneity.

Reforms and a New Era of Immigration (1960s to Present)

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 marked a turning point in U.S. immigration policy. This act, influenced by the Civil Rights Movement and Cold War politics, abolished the national origins quota system and replaced it with a preference system based on family reunification and skilled immigrants. It also placed a cap on the number of visas issued each year. The 1965 Act led to a significant increase in immigration from Asia, Latin America, and Africa. It also had a major impact on the demographics of the U.S., making it a more diverse and multicultural society.

In the decades that followed, Congress passed several other important immigration laws, including those listed in the table below:

LawYearDescription
McCarran-Walter Act1952Consolidated immigration laws and ended the exclusion of Asian immigrants, while upholding the quota system.
Displaced Persons Act1948Allowed over 200,000 displaced individuals after WWII to immigrate.
Refugee Act1980Established a new system for processing and admitting refugees.
Immigration Reform and Control Act1986Made it illegal to hire undocumented immigrants knowingly and legalized some undocumented residents.
Immigration Act1990Increased legal immigration and eased controls on temporary workers.

These laws reflect the ongoing efforts to refine and adjust U.S. immigration policy to meet the changing needs of the country and the world.

Immigration Programs and Categories

Over time, different immigration programs and categories have evolved to manage the flow of legal immigration. These include:

  • Family-sponsored immigration: This program allows U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents to sponsor certain family members for green cards.
  • Employment-based immigration: This program allows U.S. employers to sponsor foreign workers for green cards based on their skills and qualifications.
  • Refugee program: This program provides protection to individuals who have been forced to flee their home countries due to persecution or fear of persecution.

These programs, along with other categories such as diversity visas and humanitarian parole, provide legal pathways for individuals to come to the U.S.

Impact of Immigration Policies on Different Groups

Throughout history, U.S. immigration policies have had a significant impact on different immigrant groups and communities. The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, for example, specifically targeted Chinese laborers, barring them from entering the country and preventing those already in the U.S. from becoming citizens. This law had a devastating impact on Chinese communities and contributed to a long history of discrimination against Asian Americans.

Similarly, the national origins quotas of the 1920s disproportionately affected immigrants from Southern and Eastern Europe, as well as those from Asia and Africa. These quotas limited immigration from these regions, favoring those from Northern and Western Europe. This policy had a lasting impact on the demographics of the U.S. and reinforced existing racial and ethnic hierarchies.

The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, while a major step towards a more inclusive system, also had unintended consequences. The end of the Bracero Program, which had allowed Mexican laborers to work temporarily in the U.S., coincided with the imposition of new restrictions on immigration from the Western Hemisphere. This contributed to a rise in undocumented immigration from Mexico, as those who had previously entered legally were now forced to find other ways to cross the border.

Current Debates and Challenges

Today, U.S. immigration policy continues to be a source of debate and controversy. Some of the key issues include:

Border Security

The U.S.-Mexico border remains a major point of contention, with ongoing debates about how to best secure it and address unauthorized immigration. The increasing number of Central Americans seeking asylum at the border has further fueled these debates. Some argue for increased border enforcement and stricter immigration laws, while others advocate for a more humane approach that focuses on addressing the root causes of migration and providing legal pathways for those seeking refuge.

Asylum Seekers

Over the years, a rising number of asylum seekers arriving at the U.S. border has created challenges for the immigration system. Until recently, the backlog of asylum cases grew to record levels, leaving many individuals in legal limbo for years. However, beginning in June 2024, the number of people crossing the U.S.-Mexico border returned to typical levels after the Biden administration introduced the Secure the Border rule. This policy temporarily halts asylum applications at the border whenever the seven-day average of crossings exceeds 2,500.

Immigration Enforcement

There are ongoing debates about the role of immigration enforcement agencies and the treatment of undocumented immigrants. Some argue for stricter enforcement and increased deportations, while others advocate for a more compassionate approach that focuses on community policing and providing a path to citizenship for those who have lived in the U.S. for many years.

Path to Citizenship

There is no consensus on whether to provide a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants already living in the U.S. Some argue that it would reward those who have broken the law, while others believe it’s a necessary step to bring millions of people out of the shadows and integrate them fully into American society.

Economic Impact of Immigration

Immigration has a significant impact on the U.S. economy. Immigrants contribute to the labor force, start new businesses at higher rates than U.S.-born individuals, and pay taxes. They also play an important role in innovation, with immigrants being involved in the development of a significant percentage of patents in strategic industries. However, there are also concerns about the potential negative impacts of immigration, such as increased competition for jobs and downward pressure on wages for some workers.

The Role of Media and Public Perception

The media plays a powerful role in shaping public perception of immigration. Often, the focus is on border security and undocumented immigration, which can create a distorted view of the issue. This can lead to increased fear and prejudice against immigrants and make it more difficult to find common ground on immigration policy.

Mass Deportation

The idea of mass deportation, while often touted as a solution to undocumented immigration, faces significant logistical challenges and potential economic consequences. Deporting millions of people would be incredibly expensive and would likely disrupt industries that rely on immigrant labor. It could also have devastating social and humanitarian consequences, separating families and tearing apart communities.

These debates are likely to continue in the years to come, as the U.S. grapples with the challenges of managing immigration in a globalized world.

Bottom Line

U.S. immigration policies have undergone a dramatic transformation over the decades, from a period of open borders in the early years of the nation to an era of restrictive quotas based on nationality and race in the early 20th century. The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 marked a turning point, shifting towards a system that prioritizes family reunification and skilled immigration. This has led to a more diverse and multicultural society, but also new challenges in managing immigration flows and addressing unauthorized immigration.

The history of U.S. immigration policy is defined by a tension between openness and restriction, between welcoming newcomers and protecting national interests. This tension is reflected in the ongoing debates about border security, asylum seekers, immigration enforcement, and a path to citizenship. Finding a balance between these competing priorities will continue to be a central challenge for U.S. immigration policy in the 21st century.

As the U.S. moves forward, it’s important to consider the lessons of the past. Policies that restrict immigration based on race or nationality have not only been discriminatory, but have also harmed the economy and undermined American values. A comprehensive approach to immigration reform should prioritize fairness, efficiency, and compassion, while also addressing legitimate concerns about security and national interests. This will require a commitment to evidence-based policymaking, a willingness to engage in constructive dialogue, and a recognition of the important contributions that immigrants make to American society.


Boundless – for people who want the expertise of an immigration lawyer, not the price tag.

Get green card checklist